https://www-nexis-com.elib.tcd.ie/images/GBNexisLogo.gif


Download Request: Selected Items: 1-32
Time Of Request: Thursday, October 12, 2017  21:21:44

Send To:

TRINITY COLLEGE LIBRARY
COLLEGE GREEN
HOUSE 39


Terms: (promise OR pledge OR promises OR pledges OR promised OR pledged OR manifesto OR manifestos OR manifestoes AND Labour OR Conservatives OR Tories OR Conservative Party OR Liberal Democrats OR Liberal Democratic Party OR UKIP OR SNP OR Green Party OR Plaid Cymru OR Scottish National Party OR Democratic Unionist Party OR DUP)


Source: The Sun (England)
Project ID:

 

1 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 30, 2000


PORTILLO:GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN IF IT'S TOO HOT!


SECTION: THE SUN SAYS; LEADING ARTICLE


LENGTH: 886 words


MICHAEL PORTILLO says he isn't sure about his future in politics.

Well, we are.

If he doesn't buck his ideas up, he hasn't got a future.

Once he preened himself as the big cat in the Tory jungle.

Today, Portillo is a pussy cat lost in his own back yard. 

A toothless one, at that.

Twenty-four hours after The Sun gives him a mauling for his lacklustre performance as Shadow Chancellor, Portillo goes weak at the knees.

He declares he now has no ambition to be leader of the Tory Party. And says he no longer enjoys politics.

All because The Sun spoke its mind.

Well, today we're going to give Portillo some more advice:

If you can't take the heat, Michael, get out of the kitchen.

If your heart isn't in fighting Labour, then go.

If you're not totally behind William Hague, then go.

But before you do, think very carefully about the consequences for your party.

If Hague is going to make any dent in Tony Blair's massive majority at the next Election, he needs men like you to be piling in, sleeves rolled up, itching for a fight.

You should be big enough to take an adverse Sun leader, and some well justified criticism from your colleagues, in your stride.

Look at the buckletloads we tip over Blair, Hague, Gordon Brown and John Prescott.

They don't chuck in the towel. They accept criticism as part of a politician's lot.

The Sun supported the Conservative Party through some of its most heroic fights - against Kinnock, against the unions, against the Communist world - so we have a right, as a force for conservatism, to speak our minds on this issue.

As things stand, the Tories could lose the next election so comprehensively they may be finished for years.

No matter what the polls say, the divisions within the Tories make their claims to be an alternative government laughable.

Yet this comes at a time when the Blair Government is weak and, to be frank, all at sea.

There are so many open goals for the Opposition to attack.

Yet they don't.

Voters have not changed what they want from a good government.

Low taxes. Less regulation. Enterprise. Law and order. Family values. An independent sovereign Britain. A United Kingdom. Portillo should ask himself what HE can do to persuade The Sun and the voters to prefer the Tories to Labour.

He must concentrate on the issues and forget all this soul-searching and his self-indulgent, public ego trip.

Instead of wandering around Spain giving himself Andalusians of grandeur, he should knuckle down and start punching his weight in Parliament.

In John Major's government, he did a commendable job as Chief Financial Secretary.

He displayed a honed, analytical mind which easily grasped complex issues.

There was no doubt then that Portillo thirsted to be Tory leader - he told several Editors so. When Major put the leadership to the vote, Portillo installed 16 phone lines at his campaign HQ.

Curiously, he never put those phones to use. Maybe he calculated that the cleanest way to the top was to wait for Major to lose the 1997 general election.

Canny - or cowardly? No one knows. Not even, we suspect, Michael Portillo.

Losing his Enfield seat in the Blair landslide was a shattering blow to Portillo's pride. So much so that he set out to re-invent himself.

He came back in the safest of safe seats - but tolerant, touchy-feely, inclusive, all-embracing.

That wasn't the message much of the Tory party wanted to hear.

Portillo wanted to include all those minorities who had never voted Tory - and probably never would.

Portillo persuaded Hague to ditch the one policy with a proven success rate - the pledge that a Tory government would take less tax off us than a Labour one. What has Portillo told us about the Tories' spending policies?

He has failed to shoot down Labour's claim that there is a Pounds 16billion hole in the Tory plans.

He hasn't come up with a Big Idea that would attract a single vote.

Nor has he managed to land a punch on Gordon Brown. Portillo admits as much in private.

There are big soft spots on the Labour flank: stealth taxes, fuel tax, pensions, labour costs, the burden on business.

But Portillo gives the Chancellor an easy ride.

He hasn't proved he's up to the job.

More heat is turned on his own colleagues than on the Cabinet.

Portillo unwisely allows his pals to dump on those who preach a harder, more traditional Tory message.

Ann Widdecombe may not fit in with Portillo's view of an inclusive, attractive, politically correct Tory party but her common sense, down-to-earth opinions strike a huge chord with many Sun readers.

Portillo must wake up to reality and stop sniffing into his hanky.

The Tories need strong people at the helm who can instil in the party faithful - and the voters - a positive feeling of hope and courage.

Let's face it, the way the Tories stand today Blair shouldn't wait until May to call an election.

He should do it now - because he could even win with an even bigger majority.

That's not just The Sun's view. A lot of Tory backbenchers fear for their seats, too.

Portillo must make his mind up whether he's going to be an asset or a liability to the Tory party.

If he's really going to go, he should do it today.


LOAD-DATE: December 1, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


2 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 30, 2000


POUNDS 5BN BATTLE CUTS JOBLESS BY 250,000


BYLINE: David Wooding


SECTION: EXCLUSIVE


LENGTH: 93 words


THE Government has scored a major success in its Pounds 5billion war against long-term unemployment. 

It has hit targets for taking young people off the dole two years EARLY.

More than 250,000 under-25s were found jobs in the flagship New Deal programme, giving subsidised jobs or training to young people out of work for six months.

It cut the number of long-term jobless youngsters to 36,000, compared to 500,000 15 years ago.

And it means Education and Employment Secretary David Blunkett has fulfilled one of Labour's key pledges.


LOAD-DATE: December 1, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


3 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 30, 2000


POUNDS 1/2M OFF DOLE IN POUNDS 5BN BLITZ


LENGTH: 699 words


MORE than 250,000 people under 25 have been found jobs in the flagship New Deal programme, the Government will say today. 

The total of long-term jobless youngsters has been cut to 36,000 - a major success in the Pounds 5billion war on unemployment.

It shows Labour has fulfilled a key election pledge, hitting targets for taking young people off the dole two years EARLY.

The scheme offers jobs or training for young folk. Education and Employment Secretary David Blunkett said: "If they are prepared to do something for themselves, we're prepared to do something for them."


LOAD-DATE: December 1, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


4 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 30, 2000


CHHOKAR'S DAD VOWS TO FIGHT FOR PROBE


BYLINE: Hugh Dougherty


LENGTH: 182 words


THE distraught dad of murdered Indian waiter Surjit Singh Chhokar has vowed to fight for justice "until the last breath in my body."

Darsham Chhokar wept as he pledged to battle for a full public inquiry into the failed prosecution of three men accused of his 32-year-old son's murder. 

But Scotland's top lawman has rejected Mr Chhokar's pleas.

Lord Advocate Colin Boyd ruled out a public inquiry, insisting two private probes would instead look at the case and how the Chhokar family were dealt with.

Faith

Last night Mr Chhokar - who yesterday met Mr Boyd, First Minister Henry McLeish and Justice Minister Jim Wallace - hit out: "I have had to fight for my justice.

"My family is finished, my only son is gone and I have no faith in the criminal justice system."

 SNP shadow justice minister Roseanna Cunningham pushed for the Scottish Parliament to mount its own probe.

Mr Boyd also came under fire from the Chhokar Family Justice Campaign.

Spokesman Aamer Anwar said: "The family has had enough. They have a right to know what goes on, in public."


LOAD-DATE: January 28, 2001


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


5 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 25, 2000


WILKO PLEADS FOR SUPPORT


SECTION: RUGBY UNION


LENGTH: 196 words


JONNY WILKINSON insisted England's aborted strike would not stop the team doing its utmost to shoot down Argentina.

The goal-kicking fly-half promised England's bewildered fans: "We will give it everything we've got." 

A 60,000 crowd will be at Twickenham today to witness a Test match that might never have taken place.

With Wilkinson and his England team-mates on strike over pay just three days ago, the prospects looked bleak.

But now the matter has been resolved and Wilkinson hopes the fans will be forgiving.

He said: "I hope the crowd tomorrow is as intense and supportive as it was last weekend as it was a huge factor in us beating Australia.

"The decision we took was made even harder knowing that it might have a knock-on effect in terms of our support.

"We are hugely proud of their backing, and we go out there because of them and the country to give it everything we've got."

Wilkinson admitted it had been an awkward week for the squad.

He added: "It was not a happy feeling leaving the team hotel on Tuesday morning.

"The important thing is that a solution has been found. We are back now, firing and ready to go."


LOAD-DATE: November 26, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


6 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 23, 2000


MADNESS FOR 200 QUID


SECTION: RUGBY UNION


LENGTH: 534 words


Don't you dare cross Woody

CLIVE WOODWARD'S jaw was set in stone as the blazers barked complaints about the behaviour of his hooker.

England had just lost to New Zealand at Old Trafford.

But all that concerned the rugby union hawks was the behaviour of Leicester hooker Richard Cockerill. 

He had confronted the All Black haka and, in particular, opposite number Norm Hewitt.

Tradition insisted this was insulting to the tourists. Woody backed his man and effectively told the whingers to stick to their desks.

But when Cockerill went into print after last year's World Cup criticising Woodward's management style, he condemned himself to oblivion.

From No1 at No2, he became an outcast. Cockerill admitted England's supremo had told him he was history overnight.

Mercy

The lesson is, you don't cross Woodward.

The player who asks for Woodward's support will get it. If that man then betrays him, he can expect no mercy.

Which begs the question: What is the real future for the likes of England captain Martin Johnson and former skippers Matt Dawson, Lawrence Dallaglio and Jason Leonard, seen as the spokesmen for an England squad who went on strike over money?

Woodward the player was undoubtedly gifted, if a tad rebellious. He played for the Lions and helped England win a Grand Slam 20 years ago.

He also took the worst England squad in living history to Australia, New Zealand and South Africa two years ago - through no fault of his. Despite losing all seven games, he backed his players to the hilt.

So much so that when they checked into an average hotel in Cape Town, he rejected it on the grounds nobody representing England should be treated shabbily. Woodward took them to the most expensive hotel and paid for it with his credit card.

It remains a mystery whether Twickenham repaid him - but then he is a businessman, not short of a bob or two and certainly aware of the finer points of finance and negotiation.

So when he said he would back his men to the point of walking out if the row was not resolved, the players knew it was a promise.

The problem is Woodward also said: "I would be appalled if the RFU increased their offer. I have to say it is ground-breaking and I don't understand the players' rejection."

He was undoubtedly wounded by the whole sordid business and used words such as "betrayal" to illustrate how strongly he felt.

Woodward always has to support his men. Just as he backed Cockerill, he supported Dallaglio when he fought a successful legal action against allegations of drug-taking and dealing.

The fact the Wasps skipper was one of the players' spokesmen has cut Woody to the bone.

Since Woodward took over three years ago, England players have been better coached, housed, transported, fed and, frankly, cossetted.

Everything they wanted, that Woodward thought would make English rugby better, he has stamped and screamed for - and won.

That's why the former Lions and England centre feels so damaged.

I would not like to be the England player who pulls a hamstring in the coming weeks.

He might find it the smallest terminal injury in the history of sport.

Tony Roche


LOAD-DATE: November 24, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


7 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 23, 2000


COLONEL CONMAN


BYLINE: Debbie Sheldon


LENGTH: 376 words


Swindler, 83, clocks up conviction No572

AN 83-year-old conman clocked up his 572nd conviction yesterday after posing as a war hero to swindle a woman out of Pounds 2,500.

Charlie Cowden cheated his victim out of the cash by masquerading as a genuine colonel, who was commended for his distinguished service during World War II.

The Glaswegian had a card printed making himself out to be former Irish Guardsman JP Kenneally VC. 

He even had a full set of fake medals made to support the deception.

Cowden persuaded Iranian-born Khadijeh Khedri, 55, to "loan" him Pounds 2,500, after claiming he couldn't get access to his millions tucked away in deposit boxes.

But when she never saw a penny of the cash again she went to police.

A court heard how Cowden spent a lifetime "living off his dishonest wits" with the first of his convictions dating back to 1939.

Judge Timothy King - who sentenced him to two years probation - said: "You are a thorough rogue who practised deception upon this innocent young lady.

"You are no gentleman - a man, but by no means a gentleman. You are nothing but an old lag.

"Old habits die hard and you can't resist the temptation that crime offers you.

"I hope to stop your evil ways of targeting and preying on innocent victims."

Disgust

Cowden's record includes a conviction for idling on war department land in 1940, for which he received hard labour.

He also got a six-month jail sentence in 1971 for bigamy.

Courts across the country have sentenced him to a total of 35 years in prison, and he has spent 20 years of his life behind bars.

Prosecutor Anthony Orhcard told Snaresbrook Crown Court how Cowden befriended his latest victim after meeting at a market stall in London.

He said: "The defendant told her he was a retired army general who had won the Victoria Cross during World War II."

Cowden, of Kilburn, London, asked her to lend him the money after a sustained charm offensive.

Yesterday he promised to mend his ways and shook his head when the judge listed his criminal past.

Asked by Judge King why he was doing so, he said: "I am shaking my head in disgust at myself."

Cowden was ordered to pay his victim Pounds 2,500 compensation.


LOAD-DATE: January 21, 2001


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


8 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 22, 2000


PM'S PUBLIC TV GRILLING


LENGTH: 99 words


TONY Blair has agreed to be grilled by voters on a live TV show. 

He will answer questions from a studio audience and phone callers in the hour-long special at 7pm on December 12.

ITV bosses yesterday asked viewers to call or e-mail them with questions they want to put.

The show, Ask The Prime Minister, will be hosted by Jonathan Dimbleby. He promised it would be "tough."

And he said: "This is a real chance for the voters to come head-to-head with the Prime Minister."

The move follows hints that Mr Blair is considering a TV debate with Tory chief William Hague.


LOAD-DATE: November 23, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


9 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 22, 2000


WHO SHALL WE TRUST?


SECTION: THE SUN SPEAKS ITS MIND; LEADING ARTICLE


LENGTH: 1132 words


THE BRITISH PEOPLE WILL NOT BE FOOLED, MR BLAIR

TODAY two Prime Ministers talk to The Sun about the European army.

If we have to choose between Maggie Thatcher and Tony Blair, it's no contest.

The devastating attack on Blair by Baroness Thatcher strikes to the heart of the issue.

By joining the European army, Blair is committing an act of monumental folly, she declares. 

She says he is jeopardising our security and threatening to divide and destroy Nato to satisfy his own vanity.

That's exactly the way The Sun sees it, Maggie.

Baroness Thatcher is the woman who, with her great ally Ronald Reagan, won the Cold War.

Is she talking rubbish, Mr Blair?

Is she lying? Is she wild or absurd?

We know who we'd trust to defend this country's interests.

Tony Blair and Robin Cook should start treating voters like adults and tell them the truth.

Accusing The Sun and other papers of being 'dishonest' and 'absurd' is the oldest trick in the book.

By rubbishing the messenger, Blair hopes he can draw attention away from our message.

It won't work. People aren't daft.

We all know what he's up to.

Criticism of the European army is not a tabloid myth, as Blair implies in his hysterical comments.

The Times and the Daily Telegraph are against it, and they're not tabloids.

And the left-wing Guardian echoed The Sun's view about the threat to Nato in an editorial which said the European army 'may even one day render Nato redundant.'

Mind you, the Guardian thinks that would be a good idea.

Blair and Cook say the new force is not a European army.

But EU president Romano Prodi said last February: 'If you don't want to call it a European army, don't call it a European army. You can call it Margaret, you call it Mary Ann, you can call it any name.'

If a force with 100,000 troops, 400 combat aircraft, 100 warships and a full-time command structure is not an army, what the heck is it?

In his article today, Blair says fighting will remain a job for Nato.

But with the majority of our combat units committed to the European army, and others on United Nations duty, how will he split British forces three ways when Nato needs them?

The danger to Britain's vital relationship with America is there in his own words. Europe will only send in its troops when America and Nato choose to stay out, he says.

The first time that happens we will be totally at odds with our closest and most important ally.

Blair says British troops will only be used when the British Prime Minister says so.

Hah! Can anyone really imagine Blair wanting to lose face around Europe by saying No?

And if he did, wouldn't that then place us 'at the margins of the EU,' as he puts it?

Blair says we wrote nonsense by stating that America and Nato were against the plan for a European army.

Nonsense? The former Nato commander in the Mediterranean, U.S. Admiral Eugene Carroll, and Richard Perle, who may be U.S. Defence Secretary if George W. Bush becomes President, don't see it that way.

If America thought Europe was spending billions to create a strong force which would work inside Nato and help the U.S. to reduce its role as a world troubleshooter, there would indeed be rejoicing in the White House and the Pentagon.

But none of the EU countries is spending more on its forces. All that will happen with the new army is that already over-stretched resources will be spread even more thinly.

Look at Britain's once-mighty three services. Everything is being cannabilised to keep them going.

Our subs can't go to sea - we're renting German subs.

Our Harriers and Tornados spend more time in pieces in hangars than they do in the air.

Our soldiers' guns won't fire if it's cold.

What happens if we have to rely on the French or the Italians to fight for us?

Or, God help us, the Belgians?

The biggest insult to the intelligence of the British public is the Prime Minister's insistence - with the support of his fork-tongued Foreign Secretary - that The Sun is making a fuss about nothing.

Blair has no mandate for committing British forces to a European army.

There has been no debate in Parliament - other than a brief mention in the recent defence review.

Blair never sought approval for it in Labour's 1997 manifesto, but that's no surprise, since three years ago he was firmly AGAINST the plan.

We know why he's changed his tune. Because having failed to deliver British entry into the disastrous single currency, he's trying to curry favour with the EU another way.

When The Sun and other papers object, he accuses us of lying.

That's rich. We'd love to take the Government on in an honest, intelligent debate about Britain's future role in the EU.

But all we get from them is smoke, mirrors, spin and distortion.

They even dare to suggest that anyone with the temerity to question where the EU is heading, is being 'unpatriotic.'

Blair tiptoes through the dictionary and says he wants a Europe that is a superpower, not a superstate.

Will someone please explain the difference?

The EU already has its own currency, Parliament, court, passports, flag, anthem, ambassadors abroad - and soon its own army.

French President Jacques Chirac says that an integrated European defence and foreign policy is 'a fundamentally political process.'

The whole damned EU empire is about politics. Blair must reckon we are all stupid and can't see what is going on.

If the people had the facts on Europe, they would feel much more comfortable about Britain's place in it, he says.

When did the Government ever give us facts on Europe?

French PM Lionel Jospin IS honest. He says that 'a decisive step towards building a political Europe' would be the bringing together of its armed forces.

And French Defence Minister Alain Richard shoots down Blair's claim that the European army would be a peacekeeping force when he says that it must be able to deal with a 'high intensity crisis' by being able to carry out 'deep strikes.'

Does that sound like peace?

If Blair is sure he is right, and The Sun and Maggie Thatcher are wrong, let him display the courage of his convictions.

He can put his plan to join the European army to the vote in a referendum.

He could combine it with a vote on joining the single currency, then he would really know what the people of this country want.

No one asked us if we wanted our fishing industry destroyed.

No one asked if we wanted European laws imposed on us.

No one asked us if we wanted to give up our right to say No to the way Europe is heading.

Over the past few years, Britain has been betrayed.

It is time to say: No more.

Britain belongs to the people, not the politicians.


LOAD-DATE: November 23, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


10 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 21, 2000


FORGET GAY SEX, TONY, SORT OUT ALL THE CHAOS


SECTION: THE BIG ISSUE; DEAR SUN; LETTER


LENGTH: 691 words


TONY BLAIR will force through a law making gay sex legal at 16 instead of the present 18 - even though the House of Lords have rejected it three times.

The PM is determined to bring down the age for equality reasons and will overrule peers with the rarely-used Parliament Act. Your letters flooded in - all critical of Mr Blair's stance. WHY is New Labour devoting so much of its precious parliamentary time worrying about the age of consent for homosexuals? 

What with the inevitable "winter crisis" in the NHS, the trains, the floods, petrol and the dreaded euro, I'd have thought that pandering to gays would be the last thing on ministers' minds.

The Government should concentrate on things that affect the majority, not the minority.

AIMEE MEEKINGS, Thundersley, Essex

TONY BLAIR has once again shown himself anything but a man of the people as he pledges to force through the law on gay sex at 16.

It seems strange that the man who should be occupied with running the country is apparently more interested in forcing through this law where more young boys will be corrupted by predatory males

Mrs I SHAW, Luton, Beds

WHY on earth is Tony Blair so determined to force through a new law on gay sex? Is he trying to please some of his colleagues who are that way inclined?

E WHITE, Islington, North London

RIGHT now this country is a mess. We are trying to clean up after the worst floods in memory, the rail network is chaotic, the NHS is in deep trouble and the Eurocrats are trying to take away our power to govern ourselves.

Yet all Tony Blair seems concerned about is trying to make it legal to have gay sex at 16 and bailing out the Dome. Are you sure you have your priorities in order Mr Blair?

WAYNE SKELDING, Barbourne, Worcs

TONY BLAIR should think very carefully before he reduces the gay sex legal age. Even in this so-called enlightened age, many 16-year-olds are still very immature and vulnerable.

J R PEARSON, Southwell, Notts

DEFIANT Blair is riding roughshod over the democratic vote to lower the age of consent for gay sex.

The House of Lords said No, Parliament said No and, if asked, the majority of voters would say No.

But Tony Blair is determined to have his way. The same as he is determined to have his way on Europe.

E FLETCHER, Bristol

IF Tony Blair is so keen on this piece of legislation, why didn't he put it in his General Election manifesto? The Lords can see this Act for what it is - a licence for predatory men to prey on young boys

PETER NORTHCOTT, Birmingham

BLAIR is completely out of touch with voters on the homosexual age of consent.

Just what is it that drives President Blair on this issue and that of repealing Clause 28?

LUKE ELLISON, Lymington, Hants

TONY BLAIR was elected by the people to speak for the people. How can he be so bloody minded as to ignore that we just don't want the age of consent lowered from 18 to 16 for homosexuals?

The law says that you are not an adult until the age of 18. It is also accepted that boys mature less quickly than girls, making them extremely vulnerable.

A GREAVES, Bracknell, Berks

I AM disgusted with Tony and Cherie Blair. He is determined to force through the Bill on gay sex, while his lawyer wife is trying to free a paedophile on the grounds his human rights have been infringed.

What about our children's rights, Mr and Mrs Blair?

Mrs JEAN BURNS, Timperley, Cheshire

FIRST it was trying to abolish Clause 28 which forbids the promotion of homosexuality in schools, now the Government wants to reduce the age of gay consent.

Why is New Labour so obsessed with promoting gay sex? Has Mr Blair got shares in a pharmaceutical company manufacturing treatments for Aids?

W E, Maidstone, Kent

WHAT is the point of having a House of Lords if Tony Blair is simply going to ignore their majority vote against gay sex at 16 and push the Bill through the Commons?

For the third time peers have sensibly refused to lower the age of gay consent to 16, but Blair's stubborn nature is again ruling over common sense.

R DUDLEY, Tipton, West Midlands


LOAD-DATE: November 22, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


11 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 20, 2000


DUP: WE'LL KO TRIMBLE


LENGTH: 92 words


IAN Paisley's Democratic Unionists last night vowed to vanquish David Trimble at the polls and defeat the Good Friday Agreement. 

His deputy Peter Robinson pledged a "revolution within unionism" which would lead to their greatest victory over Ulster Unionists at the next general election.

"We will pick up the standard they have deserted and carry it forward," he told the party annual conference in En-niskillen, Co Fermanagh.

Mr Paisley also told supporters: "The downgrade to a united Ireland must at all costs be stopped."


LOAD-DATE: December 14, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


12 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 20, 2000


ANGER AT LEAK OVER OAP CARE


BYLINE: Andrew Nicoll, Scottish Political Reporter


LENGTH: 200 words


FURIOUS MSPs last night demanded a probe after a report which conflicts with Scottish Executive plans on free care for the elderly was leaked.

 Labour and the SNP both condemned the cross-party Health Committee document's disclosure. 

It says pensioners should be given free personal care - a move First Minister Henry McLeish promised but is now thought to be considering a U-turn over.

The SNP's health spokeswoman Nicola Sturgeon called for an inquiry into the leak.

She said: "It's disgraceful if a committee has a report leaked before it is published."

Breach

Deputy Health Minister Malcolm Chisholm described the disclosure as a "serious breach of parliamentary procedure".

He said the leak was an "insult to the vast majority of committee members who want the report to come out in the proper way".

The report calls for full implementation of the Sutherland Commission's findings which backs free care for OAPs.

The committee estimates the reforms would cost Pounds 110million to implement in full.

 Labour denied Chancellor Gordon Brown has forced Mr McLeish into a U-turn because of the costs. A spokesman said: "He wants to look again at the issue."


LOAD-DATE: January 19, 2001


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


13 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 20, 2000


DEAR SUN


SECTION: LETTER


LENGTH: 77 words


FIRST Minister Henry McLeish says he will make a bonfire out of the quangos. I seem to remember hearing that somewhere before...

Oh yes, it was New Labour's election manifesto, in 1997!

Only time will tell if McLeish is as big a liar as Blair. Instead of doing away with any quangos they have created hundreds more. The only way unemployment figures have come down is because of jobs being made for Labour cronies.

A WATSON, Girvan, Ayrshire


LOAD-DATE: January 19, 2001


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


14 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 20, 2000


DEAR SUN


SECTION: LETTER


LENGTH: 94 words


NEW Labour when in opposition rightly campaigned vigorously against Tory plans to privatise air traffic control. 

Now in government they are proposing to do exactly what they had been previously opposed. This is being done without a mandate as this policy was not in their election manifesto.

This proposition for part-privatisation has no public support whatsoever and will, if introduced, prove to be as disastrous as what happened to the railways when privatised, with safety inevitably the loser.

HUGH SNEDDON

Galashiels, Selkirkshire


LOAD-DATE: January 19, 2001


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


15 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 18, 2000


NEW BOSS FOR TOURIST BOARD


LENGTH: 63 words


SCOTLAND'S underfire tourist board has a new chief executive.

Peter McKinlay, who is head of Tayside Health Board, takes over for six months after Tom Buncle resigned last week. 

But SNP enterprise spokesman Kenny McCaskill hit out: "What was promised to be an international search for talent has ended up in Tayside. Team McLeish is letting Scotland down.'"


LOAD-DATE: January 25, 2001


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


16 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 16, 2000


IT STARTS HERE


BYLINE: George Pascoe-Watson Deputy Political Editor


SECTION: EXCLUSIVE


LENGTH: 377 words


Blair orders Cabinet to prepare for election

TONY Blair will put his ministers on a war footing tomorrow as he launches Labour's election campaign.

The PM has summoned his entire Cabinet to Chequers for a secret election-planning summit.

And he is set to double the number of Labour's key election pledges, promising the public "Ten Commitments." 

But behind the scenes Peter Mandelson has launched a veiled euro attack on Gordon Brown - with whom he shares joint charge of the campaign.

Message

Mr Blair will kick off with a huge postal crusade. In a letter going out to hundreds of thousands of voters, he says Britain is moving in the right direction thanks to the people who voted for change in 1997.

He adds: "We've taken some tough decisions - and now they are paying off."

The PM appeared on Channel 4 last night to deliver the same message. And hundreds of thousands of posters are going up hailing achievements of smaller class sizes, a million more jobs, low inflation and more nurses.

All 21 Cabinet ministers are under orders to come up with policies for Labour's new election pledge card.

Details will be thrashed out at the PM's country retreat tomorrow, along with ideas for the next manifesto as Labour draws up a blueprint for winning a historic second term.

The Government will go into the next election boasting that the five promises made in 1997 have easily been met. And they will vow sweeping changes in health, education, transport, the economy and welfare.

One senior Labour figure said: "We need to show momentum. It's a crucial meeting."

The summit at the PM's Buckinghamshire home will be a test of relations between sworn enemies Mr Mandelson and Mr Brown.

Ulster Secretary Mandy shattered the fragile Cabinet truce over the euro by saying the Government had made a mistake by putting the issue to sleep ahead of the Election.

He said ministers should instead be out blitzing the 70 per cent of voters against scrapping the Pound.

Speaking to bosses at a private dinner he huffed: "It is essential to pave the way for a referendum." His remarks are certain to infuriate the Chancellor, who convinced Tony Blair that talk of ditching Sterling would dent Labour's support.


LOAD-DATE: November 17, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


17 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 16, 2000


STING FIGHT TO KEEP JETS AWAY


BYLINE: David Wooding


SECTION: EXCLUSIVE


LENGTH: 232 words


ROCK star Sting is suing defence chiefs over plans to base giant RAF tanker planes near his mansion.

He is spearheading a fight by residents against flights of noisy VC10s over their homes. 

The singer launched a High Court action to stop 33 jets used for air-to-air refuelling being stationed at Boscombe Down, Wilts - a few miles from his house in Amesbury.

Defence chiefs are considering a Pounds 9billion plan to switch the fleet from Brize Norton, Oxfordshire.

Concerned

Sting has launched his challenge under the new Human Rights Act.

He is on tour in Indonesia. But a spokesman said: "He's greatly concerned about the effects on his life and his enjoyment of his property."

 Tory defence spokesman Robert Key last night backed Sting.

He said: "It is quite extraordinary that the MoD is trying to do this.

"There is absolutely no reason for moving the fleet from where it is."

The MoD said no final decision had been taken. FLORIDA Secretary of State Katherine Harris early today refused to accept hand recounts.

She rejected requests from several counties to update their vote tallies. She declared the count would be official when overseas ballots are returned by midnight tomorrow.

A legal appeal by Al Gore is likely.

Katherine, a Bush ally, had pledged to be fair. She said: "It's not about me, it's about the rule of the law."


LOAD-DATE: November 17, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


18 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 15, 2000


'EMPTY VOW' OF MCLEISH


LENGTH: 110 words


HENRY McLeish came under attack yesterday after he vowed to end "jobs for the boys" in Scots quangos. 

Opposition parties blasted the First Minister after he pledged to make the nation's public bodies more accountable.

Last night an SNP spokesman hit out: "We've heard all this before. They promise the earth but deliver nothing."

 Tory boss David McLetchie added: "It's a bit rich for Henry McLeish to be complaining about party place men on quangos."

Mr McLeish earlier promised to make quangos better value for money - and more open. He said: "Make no mistake, the Scottish Executive will not stand for any jobs for the boys culture."


LOAD-DATE: January 10, 2001


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


19 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 14, 2000


GAY SEX AT 16: BLAIR TO DEFY LORDS ON LAW


BYLINE: George Pascoe-Watson , Depututy political editor


LENGTH: 395 words


Outrage, say Tories

DEFIANT Tony Blair will force through a law making gay sex legal at 16 - even though Peers rejected it for the THIRD time last night.

The House of Lords threw out moves to lower the age of consent for gays from 18 by 205 votes to 144, a majority of 61.

But the PM, who is determined to bring down the age for equality reasons, will overrule the Lords with the rarely-used Parliament Act. 

Last night, Tory Baroness Young, who has led opponents of the move, said it was "morally indefensible" to use the Act in this way.

She added: "It is a constitutional outrage to use the Parliament Act on a moral issue which is subject to a free vote in both Houses and opposed by the overwhelming majority of the population.

"The Parliament Act was intended for matters of great national constitutional importance, not for gay rights." Opponents warned the move to lower the age of consent for gay sex will expose thousands of teenage boys to the danger of Aids and cancer.

And they insisted it will lead to 16-year-old girls being exposed legally to the same risks.

They are angry because the Parliament Act - in which the PM overrules both Houses - is normally only used to ensure a government's manifesto commitments are achieved.

Lowering the age of consent for gay sex was NOT part of Labour's manifesto.

Peers have now rejected the Sexual Offences (Amendments) Bill three times since Labour came to power.

Ministers believe it is unfair to outlaw sex for 16 and 17-year-old gays, while it is legal for heterosexuals of the same age.

Protect

Leader of the Lords Baroness Jay said last week: "This will become law one way or another by the end of this session."

Baroness Young put forward amendments to the Bill last night, allowing 16-year-olds to indulge in certain sexual acts but not buggery.

She told Peers: "Sixteen-year-olds are children in law.

"By keeping the age of buggery at 18, we protect young 16-year-olds from the most dangerous of sexual practices, mainly anal sex.

"I have had many letters from doctors about the great dangers to teenagers of this sexual practice.

"But leaving aside what doctors may have said, the Blood Transfusion Service says that no-one who has ever had anal sex is ever allowed to give blood.

"That should say something to us all about the dangers."


LOAD-DATE: November 15, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


20 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 14, 2000


DEFEATED BLAIR TO CUT GAY SEX AGE


BYLINE: George Pascoe-Watson


LENGTH: 267 words


DEFIANT Tony Blair will force through a law making gay sex legal at 16 - even though Peers rejected it for the THIRD time last night.

The House of Lords threw out moves to lower the age of consent for gays by 205 votes to 144, a majority of 61. 

But the PM, who is determined to bring down the age for equality reasons, will overrule the Lords with the rarely-used Parliament Act.

This allows a Prime Minister to make laws even if they have been rejected by both Houses.

Opponents, led by Tory Baroness Young, warned the move will expose thousands of teenage boys to the danger of Aids and cancer.

And they insisted it will lead to 16-year-old girls being exposed legally to the same risks.

They are angry because the Parliament Act is normally only used to ensure a government's manifesto commitments are achieved.

Protect

Lowering the age of consent for gay sex was NOT part of Labour's manifesto.

Peers have now rejected the Sexual Offences (Amendments) Bill three times since Labour came to power.

Ministers believe it is unfair for 18-year-old homosexuals to have gay sex legally - but not 16 and 17-year-olds.

Leader of the Lords Baroness Jay said: "This will become law one way or another by the end of this session."

Baroness Young put forward amendments to the Bill last night, allowing 16-year-olds to indulge in certain sexual acts but not buggery.

She told Peers: "Sixteen-year-olds are children in law.

"By keeping the age of buggery at 18, we protect young 16-year-olds from the most dangerous of sexual practices, mainly anal sex."


LOAD-DATE: November 15, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


21 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 14, 2000


POUNDS 70M FOR POOR KIDS


BYLINE: Andrew Nicoll, Scottish Political Reporter


LENGTH: 207 words


FIRST Minister Henry McLeish yesterday promised an extra Pounds 70million to help Scotland's poorest kids.

Mr McLeish unveiled the new Children's Change Fund as he launched the Executive's first social justice report in Glasgow. 

The annual report card marking the Executive's progress on key targets showed that 70,000 youngsters in Scotland have been lifted out of poverty since 1997.

And the report claims the Executive is on track for full employment, dignity in old age and an end to child poverty.

Announcing the cash would be available from the year after next, Mr McLeish said: "Last year we set out our strategy for tackling poverty and injustice and we committed ourselves to ambitious goals.

"This first annual report shows we are now moving from strategy to action - and action that is making a difference."

"This new commitment to tackling child poverty and deprivation will bring extra focus to our support for children who are most in need by supporting integrated services and innovative approaches for the most vulnerable."

But Fiona Hyslop of the SNP said: "The Pounds 70million they are boasting about barely covers the cuts Labour has made in schools and health in their first three years."


LOAD-DATE: December 27, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


22 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 10, 2000


POUNDS 200 WEALTH STEALTH TAX


BYLINE: George Pascoe-Watson


SECTION: BROWN'S MINI BUDGET


LENGTH: 429 words


NI rise hits 4m workers

FOUR million middle-income earners are to pay an extra Pounds 200 a year in stealth tax under measures finalised in the mini-Budget, it was revealed last night.

People earning more than Pounds 29,900 a year will be hit by Pounds 200 rises in their National Insurance contributions.

The move - which will raise Pounds 200million for Treasury coffers - was confirmed in the fine print of Wednesday's pre-Budget report. 

Sneaking

And last night Tories accused Chancellor Gordon Brown of sneaking the measure through without workers noticing.

Shadow Chancellor Michael Portillo said: "This is yet another stealth tax which will make people such as senior nurses and experienced teachers around Pounds 200 a year worse off.

"As with Gordon Brown's statements, a tax rise which he didn't announce has appeared in the small print."

Middle and high earners will be hit by the new tax in April next year following an inflation-busting leap in the upper limit for National Insurance contributions.

Details of the scheme were first mentioned in the March 1999 Budget - but went unnoticed.

They only emerged yesterday in the small print of a Treasury document published along with Mr Brown's mini-Budget.

Paymaster General Dawn Primarolo announced the measure.

The move will infuriate millions of hard-working professionals who backed Labour in 1997 because of Tony Blair's promise not to raise personal taxes.

They have already been hit by the end of the Pounds 200-a-year married couples' allowance and the scrapping of tax relief on mortgage interest.

 Labour's senior ministers believe their pledge not to increase personal taxes is one of their most important vote-winners.

Treasury officials last night insisted that four times as many workers will benefit from a rise in the starting limit for National Insurance contributions.

Better

They said 16 million will be better off as a result of the personal allowance rising by 3.4 per cent to Pounds 4,535.

And they urged middle income families to wait for the Government's new child tax credit, due to be paid next April, which will increase incomes.

But John Whiting, a tax partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers, said: "The Government has been quiet about raising the upper limit.

"It is a type of stealth tax - because not many people realise it's happening."

Mr Brown has been accused of raking in billions from a series of stealth taxes - measures which are often not spotted or go unnoticed by consumers.

The Sun Says - Page Eight


LOAD-DATE: November 11, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


23 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 9, 2000


WHAT IT MEANS FOR MR BLAIR


SECTION: THE SUN SAYS; LEADING ARTICLE


LENGTH: 384 words


THE deadlock in America has given Tony Blair and Gordon Brown a real scare.

Even eight years of economic boom was not an automatic guarantee of re election for the Democrats.

Al Gore could not convince voters that he and Bill Clinton deserved all the credit for America's prosperity. 

That is the same challenge Blair and Brown face - but which Brown tackled yesterday with a masterly performance.

In the U.S., people know Federal Reserve boss Alan Greenspan masterminded the good times.

In Britain, Labour's bold decision to give the Bank of England control over interest rates helped them build on the solid legacy left them by the Tories.

America's near deadheat shows Blair that no politician can ever take the people for granted.

That's why Brown's mini-Budget was so important.

He has surely taken the heat out of the fuel protest and must believe he has paved the way for Labour's second term in office.

More money for pensioners, schools and poorer families is good news for millions.

It's a pity motorists must wait until April before cheaper "green" fuel appears at the pumps.

But by cutting the cost of taxing their cars for five million drivers, Brown cleverly destroyed one of the Tories' big election hopes.

They had promised a cut of three pence a litre.

Brown's measures are worth the equivalent of FOUR pence a litre.

And he's bought off the truckers with vehicle tax cuts to match the lowest in Europe.

Brown denies his hand has been forced by public opinion.

But after the uproar over the 75p pension rise in the last Budget, he's now giving single pensioners Pounds 5 a week next year and Pounds 8 for married couples.

Plus the Pounds 200 cheque in the post from next week.

A U-turn or a listening Chancellor?

That's for voters to decide.

What they will want to see from Blair and Brown are the radical reforms they boasted of in 1997.

Improved teaching standards. Private money to transform the health service.

A big axe on welfare handouts to scroungers. And a guarantee that extra billions pumped into public services will be well spent.

These are the same problems Gore faced against a tough opponent like Bush.

Blair must be thankful that he'll get an easier ride from the lacklustre Tories.


LOAD-DATE: November 10, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


24 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 8, 2000


BROWNIE POINT


SECTION: SUN SAYS; LEADING ARTICLE


LENGTH: 151 words


WE were going to tell Gordon Brown what we expect from him today.

But since almost all his plans have been leaked in advance, there's no point. 

If the leaks are true - and we'll be amazed if they're not - the Chancellor will deliver an intelligent package.

He is giving more money to pensioners, not back to motorists.

And according to the polls, most people think that's right.

We still believe Brown should be cutting fuel duty today. That would show that the Government listens and understands.

But with a six point lead in the polls over the Tories, Brown and Blair may say: Why worry?

It's becoming more and more clear that, barring a sensational upset, the Tories haven't a hope of winning the Election.

William Hague's aim must be to get Blair's majority down to less than a hundred.

The Tory promise to cut 3p off fuel tax might be the weapon to achieve that.


LOAD-DATE: November 9, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


25 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 6, 2000


STOP PUMPING OUT EXCUSES AND CUT OUR FUEL TAXES, TONY


SECTION: DEAR SUN; LETTER; THE BIGISSUE


LENGTH: 909 words


WITH just a week to go until the petrol protesters' deadline for Government action, PM Tony Blair is still standing strong in his refusal to slash fuel duty.

He has said that a large tax cut would affect pensioners, the economy and the public services.

And Home Secretary Jack Straw fuelled more petrol panic-buying by urging people to fill up now in preparation for more blockades.

Many Sun readers are not impressed with the Government's stance. Most want a sizeable cut in petrol prices. I FEAR Tony Blair is indulging in brinkmanship in warning hauliers and farmers not to set up new petrol blockades. 

He quotes all the hardships it will cause but they could easily be avoided if Blair insisted Gordon Brown reduces the fuel tax by dipping into his bulging coffers.

Then national unity would be peacefully maintained.

ROBERT HIGTON, Gedling, Notts

WE keep hearing that cutting fuel tax would mean losing on pensions, schools and hospitals.

Right, but when did Tony Blair say in the last election that petrol would cost more because of them?

R CARTER, Folkestone, Kent

TONY Blair's promises are like piecrusts - easily broken. He promised a decent rise to the elderly, yet again they are to be brushed aside.

To use the much-needed rise as an excuse not to drop fuel prices is despicable and cowardly.

Come on Mr Blair - try keeping at least one promise to the elderly.

Mrs D REDDEN, Castleford, West Yorks

ACCORDING to an interview I heard, if petrol taxes were cut we would would lose vast numbers of nurses, doctors, and schools.

Isn't it odd that we would never lose any civil servants?

Nor, I suspect - to take an example of Government spending - would we lose fig trees at that new parliamentary building for MPs, Portcullis House.

ALEX SWANSON, Milton Keynes

THE Government must cut petrol prices in the mini-budget by a reasonable level.

We don't expect massive cuts, just enough to show that they admit they've made a mistake and they listen to public opinion.

The country won't accept empty gestures, only constructive action.

MARK WHITEMAN, Maesteg, Mid Glamorgan

YOU'VE got to admire Tony Blair's nerve, if nothing else.

How does he dare say that fuel protesters have no right to bring the country to a standstill when the sheer greed of his own Government is the cause of the problem?

He applauds people who stand up to dictators in other countries, but when we do it here, he treats us like something he's stepped in.

People hate being taken for mugs, and it's the ultimate insult to expect us all to keep paying extra cash on a Government whim.

G REDMOND, Newquay, Cornwall

WHILE I fully support the need for a cut in fuel prices, I could not support any protest action that would harm our economy and people, such as blocking food depots. Help for farmers and road hauliers is a must, they are our nation's life blood.

As for the rest of us, a 2p cut in the price per litre and a Pounds 10 cut in the rip-off road tax across the board would go a long way.

J M, Lancing, West Sussex

ONCE again New Labour has scored an own goal.

By telling everyone to keep their petrol tanks topped up, they have caused queues at the pumps.

Surely someone in the Cabinet realised that would happen?

And as for bringing in the Army to keep things moving, that too will provoke a bad situation and make things worse.

WE BARNEY, Springbourne, Dorset

OF course the Chancellor isn't going to budge on petrol tax until the very last minute.

Gordon Brown is well known for his prudence and it makes common sense to take as much money as possible up to the 60-day deadline set by protesters.

I wouldn't be surprised if he includes fuel in his mini-budget at the last moment to prevent "Armageddon" before Christmas.

Mrs ANDREA PEELE, Kettering, Northants

PETROL companies say demands for fuel have increased 75 per cent since Jack Straw last week advised drivers and essential services to fill up before the next blockade.

Did the Home Secretary honestly believe the ordinary motorist would ignore his statement? If he did, it proves he is irresponsible and shows how far removed the Government are from the people.

ERNEST MUNDY, Buckhurst Hill, Essex

IT'S time for this Government to get their priorities right.

They are more worried about troops delivering fuel than sending them to help people who have had their homes and businesses destroyed by the floods.

C BISHOP, Hornchurch, Essex

THERE has been a certain amount of criticism over the present panic-buying by motorists.

But when you look at the cause, reasons and alternative transport available, it leaves many of us little choice but to get it while we can!

D CAREY, Edmonton, North London

MOST of the nation want to see a cut in the crippling fuel tax but Tony Blair is hell-bent on confrontation with protesters.

Any protest will be a people's protest and he will put himself in a no-win situation if he uses the Army to smash picket lines.

Blair may get the petrol through but he will be dumped at the ballot box at the next election.

Mrs B TAYLOR, St Helens, Merseyside

JACK Straw was irresponsible in urging people to fill up with petrol now. That kind of talk led to panic during the last fuel crisis.

The Government should look at ways of cutting petrol tax instead of fuelling people's fears.

NIGEL LEIGH, Glasgow


LOAD-DATE: November 7, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


26 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 6, 2000


BACK US OR SACK US SAYS PRESCOTT


BYLINE: George Pascoe-Watson


SECTION: BRITAIN IN CHAOS


LENGTH: 280 words


Deputy Political Editor

DEFIANT John Prescott yesterday challenged motorists to boot Labour out if they don't like this week's mini Budget.

The deputy PM reminded them they can dump the Government at the polls over the cost of petrol. 

Warning

It was advanced warning of a keynote speech today by Gordon Brown in which the Chancellor will kill off all hopes of a cut in fuel duty.

Mr Prescott said: "Government must govern. The Prime Minister has made that clear - and at the end of the day we will be accountable to the electorate."

He was backed by Tony Blair, who shrugged off claims he was out of touch with voters over petrol costs.

The PM insisted cutting fuel tax would lead to higher mortgages by triggering inflation.

Mr Brown has drawn up a Pounds 1billion package aimed at cutting the costs of the haulage industry and farmers.

He hopes it will stop them bringing the country to a standstill with protests after Wednesday's pre-Budget report.

The cost of tax discs will fall for some trucks. And foreign lorry drivers will be charged Pounds 1,500 for a licence to work in Britain.

Mr Brown will warn business leaders at the CBI conference today that giving in to fuel protests will smash his hopes of matching the performance of world-beating U.S. firms.

Supplies

Last night petrol supplies in Scotland were returning to normal after a wave of panic-buying died down.

And protest leaders who helped halt fuel supplies leaving the Grangemouth refinery pledged not to repeat the action.

Haulier Robbie Burns, 44, said: "The way to take action is democratically - at the ballot box."

The Sun Says - Page Eight


LOAD-DATE: January 18, 2001


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


27 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 4, 2000


'WE BACK ACTION'


SECTION: FUEL CRISIS


LENGTH: 376 words


SUN readers have signalled that they are BACKING another round of fuel blockades - even if it brings Britain to a standstill.

You phoned, faxed and e-mailed us in your hundreds to pledge support for protesters.

Many rounded on Home Secretary Jack Straw following his advice to motorists to "fill up now" on Monday. 

Stir

His comment triggered panic buying at petrol stations ahead of the protesters' deadline for renewed action on November 13.

Despatch manager Bill McKinlay, 45, from NAIRN, said: "I think Jack Straw and Tony Blair are just spoiling for a fight.

"The comments they have been making over the past few days have been pretty inflammatory.

"And by bringing in the police and troops it gives the impression they are prepared to fight it out."

Scott Sutherland, 28, from INVERNESS, reckons drivers should stop panic buying.

Water board worker Scott said: "People are stocking up when there is no problem.

"I'm not worried at the moment because even the protest leaders say there's no need to panic."

Hairdresser Sharon Forrester, 30, is 100 per cent behind the fuel protesters. Sharon, of FALKIRK, said: "It should go ahead. The country should be run like a business.

"If one government does not make a job of it, they should give somebody else a chance."

Machine operator Allan Wilson accuses the Government of scaremongering over the fuel crisis.

Allan, 44, of FIFE, said: "It's ridiculous that we are an oil-producing country, yet petrol's so dear. When you go to Spain, which has no oil, you pay just 44p a litre."

DUNFERMLINE factory worker Gus Clark reckons Labour should resign over the fuel protest.

Gus, 47, said: "We are the only EU country producing oil, but we pay the highest prices.

"If the Government can't work out what's wrong and do something about it, out with them.

"Jack Straw lectures us about it all. He is the man caught driving at 103mph and who gets his son off a drugs charge."

Janette Baxter, from GLASGOW, reckons voters should save their protests till the next election.

Housewife Janette, 59, said: "We should hit them where it hurts at the next general election. They should have listened to the people and now they'll never get back in."


LOAD-DATE: January 18, 2001


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


28 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 4, 2000


NOW JUST MAKE SURE IT NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN


BYLINE: Andrew Nicoll Scottish Political Reporter


SECTION: THE GREAT EXAM SHAMBLES


LENGTH: 585 words


McConnell axes SQA boss over report

JACK McCONNELL yesterday sacked the chairman of the Scottish Qualifications Authority and vowed to set up a new "early warning system" to prevent another exams fiasco.

The Education Minister also accepted the resignations of the other 23 board members after the publication of a report into the crisis which hit thousands of schoolkids.

Some will be allowed to stay in their posts to keep the SQA running. Chairman David Miller will be replaced by Scottish Homes boss John Ward who is under orders to provide a recovery plan within a fortnight. 

The report, by Deloitte and Touche, blamed "management weakness" for last summer's blunders. Mr McConnell promised "immediate and comprehensive action" to prevent a repeat.

He said: "The problems highlighted by this report simply cannot happen again next year. We must restore confidence and put in place a means of monitoring progress.

Surprise

"The report paints a stark picture of an organisation with significant management weaknesses, where poor planning led to a crisis from which it could not recover.

"None of this was a surprise. However, after reading the report, I was appalled by the scale of the organisational failure."

Mr McConnell said: "My top priority is to ensure that next year's exam results are accurate and on time. The young people of Scotland deserve the best. We will leave no stone unturned to ensure that the SQA make that a reality."

Thousands of youngsters were given incomplete, late or wrong results for their Scottish Standard Grade exams and for the new system of Higher exams in August.

The SQA's chief executive Ron Tuck, resigned soon after the crisis broke and two other senior figures also left. Mr Tuck was replaced by Bill Morton.

Mr McConnell said: "The remit I have given Mr Morton is to put in place the systems, the people and the organisation that can deliver.

"He can step on any toes he wants anywhere in Scotland to deliver that and he will have my backing. That will go for Mr Ward as well."

But teachers' union leader, Derek Kennedy, insisted the blame for the exam crisis went beyond the SQA board. The NASUWT president said it was "important that a number of people who clearly have a responsibility leave."

He added that it was "very significant" that the report had listed as a cause of the crisis the fact that the SQA did not have detailed information about the Higher Still requirements.

He said: "It looks as if the SQA was experiencing the same kind of difficulties that teachers have had and if that is so then quite clearly responsibility goes beyond the SQA and must focus on the Higher Still development unit and the role of the inspectorate as well."

Signal

Scottish Tory education spokesman Brian Monteith said the resignations sent out a strong signal to pupils, teachers and parents.

He said: "What Sam Galbraith failed to do in a couple of months Jack McConnell has done in a couple of days."

Lib Dems counterpart Jamie Stone said: "The board of the SQA have clearly failed in their responsibilities.

"From the initial information that Higher results would be late to the recent revelations surrounding the non-urgent appeals, the reputation of Scottish education has taken a battering.

"It is now up to the new chairman of the SQA to restore that reputation.

"The scenes we have witnessed cannot be allowed to be repeated and the new chairman must ensure that they never are."


LOAD-DATE: January 18, 2001


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


29 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 3, 2000


SQA BOARD FACES THE AXE OVER EXAM ROW


BYLINE: Andrew Nicoll


LENGTH: 194 words


THE entire board of the Scottish Qualifications Authority faces the axe today with the publication of a report on this summer's exams fiasco.

First Minister Henry McLeish yesterday promised "tough action" to ensure there is no repeat of the crisis which hit thousands of youngsters. 

Earlier this week, red-faced officials had to admit dozens of exam appeals are still not complete and angry Education Minister Jack McConnell admitted his patience has snapped.

Yesterday, Mr McLeish said: "There will be a full discussion but, when the dust settles, we have a single purpose to move on from here. This fiasco should never, ever happen again."

Jack McConnell can't sack the SQA board, but he can ask them to resign and he's expected to act after the publication of a report by consultants Deloitte & Touche.

 SNP education spokesman Mike Russell backed the shake-up plan last night.

In a letter to Mr McConnell, he said: "I do not think it is feasible for the board to remain in office any longer."

THE chief inspector of English schools, Chris Woodhead, 53, quit last night after a six-year reign as the scourge of bad teachers.


LOAD-DATE: January 17, 2001


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


30 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 3, 2000


DENNIS: DEAL ME BACK IN


BYLINE: Andrew Nicoll, Scottish Political Reporter


SECTION: EXCLUSIVE


LENGTH: 380 words


Rebel MSP's set to rejoin Labour

 LABOUR bosses have agreed a secret deal to allow rebel MP Dennis Canavan back into the party.

They will blame a faulty selection procedure for blocking him from standing as Labour candidate in Falkirk at the Scottish elections.

Mr Canavan, above, WILL reapply to join the party after accepting the deal. 

Under normal rules, anyone booted out is barred from rejoining for five years.

But a party insider said last night: "These are special circumstances."

Mr Canavan's feud with Labour started when his Falkirk West constituency humiliated party leaders at a pre-devolution conference.

They put down a motion slamming Gordon Brown's plans to cut single parent benefit as "economically inept, morally repugnant and spiritually bereft."

And they were backed by rank-and-file members despite an all-out attack by party bosses. Every member of the constituency party was later barred from the Scottish Parliament.

That was the start of a rift between Mr Canavan and late First Minister Donald Dewar, who branded him "not good enough" for the Scottish Parliament.

Defied

The maverick MP was kicked out of Labour when he defied party chiefs by standing as an independent in Falkirk West - winning a seat at Holyrood.

He has called a press conference for today to discuss "the possibility of rejoining the Labour Party."

But last night it was clear the rebel has accepted the deal from Labour bosses.

Friends in Parliament confirmed an offer is on the table. One said: "He's definitely got a deal. The question was whether he was going to accept it."

The key bargaining counter is Mr Canavan's threat to quit his Westminster seat and force a by-election.

A month ago he announced he was to stand down - and pledged to resign by last Monday.

But he made it clear he wants to rejoin Labour - and revealed party leaders have been trying to prevent a by-election in Falkirk.

While Labour is confident of winning the two by-elections in Mr Dewar's Anniesland seats, Falkirk is much more dangerous for them.

Last week Mr Canavan made another appeal for reconciliation. He told Parliament: "If I had still been a member of the Labour Party I might have ended up voting for Henry McLeish."


LOAD-DATE: January 17, 2001


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


31 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 2, 2000


NEW DRUG COURTS TO KO ABUSE


LENGTH: 133 words


THE Scottish Executive will today unveil plans for new courts dedicated to cracking the drugs problem.

Edinburgh MSP Ian Gray will be named Minister for Drugs and Executive insiders say the new courts will help offenders caught up in drugs misuse. 

Drug dealers will still appear before traditional courts.

An Executive source said: "One of the key things is to try to break the cycle of court-prison-out and back to court."

The Executive has earmarked Pounds 100million over three years to battle the drugs menace and Pounds 9.5million of that is aimed at keeping addicts out of jail.

But the SNP say Labour has nicked their idea. Shadow Justice Minister Roseanna Cunningham said: "The plan for drugs courts was an SNP manifesto pledge which Labour refused to back."


LOAD-DATE: November 23, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD


32 of 32 DOCUMENTS


The Sun


November 2, 2000


IF IT'S A CRIME TO BE A PROUD SCOT,I'M GUILTY


BYLINE: Mark Howarth


SECTION: EXCLUSIVE


LENGTH: 239 words


Swinney plates fury

 SNP leader John Swinney yesterday vowed to defy an EU ruling which will ban number plates displaying the Saltire.

He declared: "If it's a crime to be proud of your country, then I plead guilty." 

We revealed yesterday that the letters SCO and the Saltire will be outlawed from reg plates from September 2001. The only flag allowed will be the European Stars symbol. Drivers repeatedly caught with illegal plates could be fined Pounds 1,000.

Mr Swinney vowed to put a Saltire on his Peugeot 206 just like his predecessor Alex Salmond did on his Ford Scorpio.

Popular

He said: "Anybody driving on Scottish roads knows how popular these plates have become in recent years.

"It's a sign of a growing sense of Scottish identity.

"Is that why the Government is acting to clamp down on them?

"I don't have a set of Scottish number plates but I'm going to get one now and if they want to start prosecuting ordinary Scottish drivers, they can start with me!" Scottish Sun readers also pledged to buy up new SCO plates for their motors to defy the ban.

Mini skip hire boss Bill Thomson, from Stirling, raged: "I have three lorries and a car and I am going out now to get them all fitted with the Saltire plates.

"I am fed up with the EU and its silly ideas."

George O'Hara, of Glasgow-based Prestige Number Plates, said: "What's spewing out of Brussels is absolute nonsense."


LOAD-DATE: November 23, 2000


LANGUAGE: English


PUB-TYPE: Newspaper


Copyright 2000 NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LTD